[This is an excerpt.] Burnout and the related morale injury it causes are characterized by physical and/or emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and decreased effectiveness. Burnout is all too common in physicians and is estimated to affect at least 50% of physicians at some point in their career.1 Many systemic risk factors contribute to this epidemic, including high patient volumes, increased administrative burden, lack of "user-friendly" electronic medical records, and lack of organizational infrastructure. Personal risk factors include being female, not having a spouse or partner, and being of younger age. [To read more, click View Resource.]
Burnout: Which Way Out?
Through a national survey, researchers identified prevalent work overload, burnout, and intent to leave health care professions among nurses, clinical staff, and non-clinical staff, including housekeeping, administrative staff, lab technicians, and food service workers.
COVID Burnout Hitting All Levels of Healthcare Workforce
INTRODUCTION: Acute care surgeons can experience posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) due to the cumulative stress of practice. This study sought to document the potential impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on PTSD in acute care surgeons and to identify potential contributing factors. METHODS: The six-item brief version of the PTSD Checklist-Civilian Version (PCL-6), a validated instrument capturing PTSD symptomology, was used to screen Eastern Association for the Surgery of Trauma members. Added questions gauged pandemic effects on professional and hospital systems-level factors. Regression modeling used responses from attending surgeons that fully completed the PCL-6. RESULTS: Complete responses from 334 of 360 attending surgeons were obtained, with 58 of 334 (17%) screening positive for PTSD symptoms. Factors significantly contributing to both higher PCL-6 scores and meeting criteria for PTSD symptomology included decreasing age, increased administrative duties, reduced research productivity, nonurban practice setting, and loss of annual bonuses. Increasing PCL-6 score was also affected by perceived illness risk and higher odds of PTSD symptomology with elective case cancellation. For most respondents, fear of death and concerns of illness from COVID-19 were not associated with increased odds of PTSD symptomology. CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of PTSD symptomology in this sample was similar to previous reports using surgeon samples (15%-22%). In the face of the COVID-19 pandemic, stress was not directly related to infectious concerns but rather to the collateral challenges caused by the pandemic and unrelated demographic factors. Understanding factors increasing stress in acute care surgeons is critical as part of pandemic planning and management to reduce burnout and maintain a healthy workforce.
COVID Stressed, but Not Due to the Virus
To explore the mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on healthcare workers in Massachusetts and identify potential strategies to maintain the healthcare workforce we conducted a sequential exploratory mixed methods study. Fifty-two individuals completed interviews from April 22nd - September 7th, 2021; 209 individuals completed an online survey from February 17th - March 23rd, 2022. Interviews and surveys asked about the mental health impacts of working in healthcare during the COVID-19 pandemic, burnout, longevity in the workplace, and strategies for reducing attrition. Interview and survey participants were predominantly White (56%; 73%, respectively), female (79%; 81%) and worked as physicians (37%; 34%). Interviewees indicated high stress and anxiety levels due to frequent exposure to patient deaths from COVID-19. Among survey respondents, 55% reported worse mental health than before the pandemic, 29% reported a new/worsening mental health condition for themselves or their family, 59% reported feeling burned out at least weekly, and 37% intended to leave healthcare in less than 5 years. To decrease attrition, respondents suggested higher salaries (91%), flexible schedules (90%), and increased support to care for patients (89%). Healthcare workers’ experiences with death, feeling unvalued, and overworked resulted in unprecedented rates of burnout and intention to leave healthcare.
COVID-19 Pandemic Impacts on Mental Health, Burnout, and Longevity in the Workplace Among Healthcare Workers: A Mixed Methods Study
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study is to increase understanding regarding healthcare provider experiences with psychological trauma, moral injury, and institutional betrayal, both over the lifetime and during the COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: The study employed a cross-sectional design to understand traumatic experiences, moral injury, and institutional betrayal among medical and mental health providers. Participants were asked to identify an index trauma, and experiences were coded qualitatively using categories for traumatic events, moral injury, and institutional betrayal. RESULTS: Results revealed that experiences of trauma, moral injury, and institutional betrayal were common in relation to the pandemic, as were prepandemic histories of traumatic exposures. Findings indicate that trauma exposure was a work hazard for healthcare providers during the pandemic, which could result in negative long-term mental health outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Future research is needed to explore potential long-term negative outcomes among healthcare providers.
COVID-19 and Lifetime Experiences of Trauma, Moral Injury, and Institutional Betrayal among Healthcare Providers
Healthcare workers are highly regarded for their compassion, dedication, and composure. However, COVID-19 created unprecedented demands that rendered healthcare workers vulnerable to increased burnout, anxiety, and depression. This cross-sectional study assessed the psychosocial impact of COVID-19 on U.S. healthcare frontliners using a 38-item online survey administered by Reaction Data between September and December 2020. The survey included five validated scales to assess self-reported burnout (Maslach Summative Burnout Scale), anxiety (GAD-7), depression (PHQ-2), resilience (Brief Resilience Coping Scale), and self-efficacy (New Self-Efficacy Scale-8). We used regression to assess the relationships between demographic variables and the psychosocial scales index scores and found that COVID-19 amplified preexisting burnout (54.8%), anxiety (138.5%), and depression (166.7%), and reduced resilience (5.70%) and self-efficacy (6.5%) among 557 respondents (52.6% male, 47.5% female). High patient volume, extended work hours, staff shortages, and lack of personal protective equipment (PPE) and resources fueled burnout, anxiety, and depression. Respondents were anxious about the indefinite duration of the pandemic/uncertain return to normal (54.8%), were anxious of infecting family (48.3%), and felt conflicted about protecting themselves versus fulfilling their duty to patients (44.3%). Respondents derived strength from their capacity to perform well in tough times (74.15%), emotional support from family/friends (67.2%), and time off work (62.8%). Strategies to promote emotional well-being and job satisfaction can focus on multilevel resilience, safety, and social connectedness.
COVID-19 and Psychosocial Well-Being: Did COVID-19 Worsen U.S. Frontline Healthcare Workers’ Burnout, Anxiety, and Depression?
In this report and analysis of the results of a late 2021 post-COVID pandemic survey of members of the Society of Thoracic Radiology, we compared cardiothoracic radiologist workloads and burnout rates with those obtained from a prepandemic survey of society members. The more recent survey also asked respondents to provide a subjective assessment of their individual workload capacity should they be required to read cases at a section average daily case work volume, and this assessment was correlated with burnout rates. To measure nonrelative value unit workload, we requested data on non–case-related work responsibilities including teaching and multidisciplinary conferences that were not assessed in the first survey. In addition, we asked respondents to provide information on the availability of support services, personnel, and hardware and software tools that could improve work efficiency and reduce radiologist stress levels thereby mitigating burnout. We found that postpandemic case workload and cardiothoracic radiologists’ burnout rates were similarly high compared with prepandemic levels with an overall burnout rate of 88% including a 100% burnout rate among women which had significantly increased. The range of radiologists’ workload capacity is broad, although 80% of respondents reported that reading at an average sectional case volume was at or above their capacity, and the perceived capacity correlated with burnout measures. The presence of fellows and computer-aided diagnosis/artificial intelligence tools were each associated with significant decreases in burnout, providing 2 potential strategies that could be employed to address high cardiothoracic radiologist burnout rates.
Cardiothoracic Radiologist Workload, Work Capacity, and Burnout Post-COVID: Results of a Survey From the Society of Thoracic Radiology
BACKGROUND: Career satisfaction and burnout among physicians are important to study because they impact healthcare quality, outcomes, and physicians' well-being. Relationships between religiosity and these constructs are underexplored, and Muslim American physicians are an understudied population. METHODS: To explore relationships between career satisfaction, burnout, and callousness and Muslim physician characteristics, a questionnaire including measures of religiosity, career satisfaction, burnout, callousness, and sociodemographic characteristics was mailed to a random sample of Islamic Medical Association of North America members. Statistical relationships were explored using chi-squared tests and logistic regression models. RESULTS: There were 255 respondents (41% response rate) with a mean age of 52 years. Most (70%) were male, South Asian (70%), and immigrated to the United States as adults (65%). Nearly all (89%) considered Islam the most or very important part of their life, and 85% reported being somewhat or very satisfied with their career. Multivariate models revealed that workplace accommodation of religious identity is the strongest predictor of career satisfaction (odds ratio [OR]: 2.69, p = 0.015) and that respondents who considered religious practice to be the most important part of their lives had higher odds of being satisfied with their career (OR: 2.21, p = 0.049) and lower odds of burnout (OR: 0.51, p = 0.016). Participants who felt that their religion negatively influenced their relationships with colleagues had higher odds of callousness (OR: 2.25, p = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: For Muslim physicians, holding their religion to be the most important part of their life positively associates with career satisfaction and lower odds of burnout and callousness. Critically, perceptions that one's workplace accommodates a physician's religious identity associate strongly with career satisfaction. In this era of attention to physician well-being, the importance of religiosity and religious identity accommodations to positive career outcomes deserves focused policy attention.
Career Satisfaction and Burnout among American Muslim Physicians
Violence against nurses is a disturbing trend in healthcare that has reached epidemic proportions globally. These violent incidents can result in physical and psychological injury, exacerbating already elevated levels of stress and burnout among nurses, further contributing to absenteeism, turnover, and intent to leave the profession. To ensure the physical and mental well-being of nurses and patients, attention to the development of strategies to reduce violence against nurses must be a priority. Caring knowledge—rooted in the philosophy of care—is a potential strategy for mitigating violence against nurses in healthcare settings. We present what caring knowledge is, analyze its barriers to implementation at the health system and education levels and explore potential solutions to navigate those barriers. We conclude how the application of models of caring knowledge to the nurse-patient relationship has the potential to generate improved patient safety and increased satisfaction for both nurses and patients.
Caring Knowledge as a Strategy to Mitigate Violence against Nurses: A Discussion Paper
AIMS: To synthesize the empirical and theoretical literature on change fatigue in nursing, including how change fatigue affects nurses, the nursing profession and strategies to prevent and overcome it. BACKGROUND: Change fatigue refers to the overwhelming feelings of stress, exhaustion and burnout associated with rapid and continuous change across healthcare organizations. Change fatigue can affect nurses' wellbeing, yet there is a distinct lack of literature which synthesizes the relationship between cumulative organizational change and nurses' wellbeing. DESIGN: Integrative review following Toronto and Remington and Whittemore and Knafl methodology. DATA SOURCES: Searches were conducted in CINAHL, Embase, Medline, APA PsycInfo, Scopus, Business Source Complete and ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global in January 2022. REVIEW METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted to identify literature on change fatigue in nursing. Included literature were critically appraised for methodological quality. Data from each article were abstracted and thematically analysed. RESULTS: Twenty-six articles were included in this review, including 14 empirical studies, 10 theoretical papers and two literature reviews. Five main themes described in the literature included: definitions, preceding factors, associated behaviours, consequences and mitigation strategies for change fatigue. CONCLUSION: This review highlights the impact of rapid and continuous change on nurses and nursing practice. Further research is needed to explore the relationship between change fatigue and burnout, understand how and why nurses withdraw or avoid change, and to develop a metric to measure change fatigue when considering new change initiatives. IMPACT: Findings from this review generated an improved understanding of how change fatigue affects nurses, the nursing profession and strategies to prevent and overcome it. This paper provides practical recommendations for future research, direction for nursing educators and leaders, and encourages nurses to practice political agency with change management.
Change Fatigue in Nursing: An Integrative Review
OBJECTIVES: Electronic health record (EHR) inbox notifications can be burdensome for primary care providers (PCPs), potentially contributing to burnout. We estimated the association between changes in the quantities of EHR inbox notifications and PCP burnout. STUDY DESIGN: In this observational study, we tested the association between the percent change in daily inbox notification volumes and PCP burnout after an initiative to reduce low-value notifications at the Veterans Health Administration (VHA). METHODS: The VHA initiative resulted in increases and decreases in notification volumes for PCPs. For each facility, the proportion of PCPs reporting burnout was estimated using VHA All Employee Survey responses before and after the initiative in 2016 and 2018, respectively. Survey responses were aggregated for 6459 PCPs (physicians, nurse practitioners, and physician assistants) at 138 VHA facilities. Fixed effects regression models estimated the association of small and large increases and small and large decreases in notifications on burnout. RESULTS: Daily inbox notifications per PCP decreased by a mean (SD) of 5.9% (30.1%) across study facilities, from a mean (SD) of 128 (52) notifications to 114 (44) notifications after the initiative. Fifty-one percent of facilities experienced reductions in notifications, 30% experienced no change, and 20% experienced increased notifications. PCP burnout was not significantly associated with any level of increase or decrease in notifications. CONCLUSIONS: Changes in notification volumes alone did not predict PCP burnout. Future research to reduce burnout might still address EHR notification volumes, but as part of a broader set of strategies that consider the other stressors that PCPs experience.
Changes in Electronic Notification Volume and Primary Care Provider Burnout
As humanitarian emergencies become increasingly prevalent and protracted, the sustainability and quality of humanitarian aid work are threatened by its staff’s unaddressed occupational stress and mental health problems. While there is accumulating research on psychological and stress-related disorders’ prevalence and risk factors, there is less evidence on empirically supported mental health and psychosocial support (MHPSS) interventions for humanitarian and disaster relief personnel. Existing interventions are primarily reactive rather than preventive, may produce iatrogenic effects, and are poorly implemented. This chapter synthesizes the extant literature and proposes a comprehensive and systematic framework for the promotion of wellbeing, prevention, and management of occupational stress-related mental health and psychosocial problems for this occupational group. Informed by risk and protective factors unique to humanitarian and emergency relief work, the chapter summarizes a broad spectrum of interventions across various deployment and emergency response phases and targeted at the individual staff, managers, team, and organization levels. The chapter recommends organizational-level MHPSS policy and standards of practice; predeployment psychoeducational training; perideployment mental health monitoring and support; manager-specific training; peer support programs; stepped-care crisis intervention and psychological treatment model; and promoting resilience and posttraumatic growth. Specific adaptations for vulnerable demographic groups in this workforce and potential implementation barriers are discussed. The comprehensive, evidence-informed MHPSS intervention framework outlined in this chapter can serve as a blueprint for staff care in humanitarian aid organizations.
Chapter 21 - Psychosocial Interventions for Occupational Stress and Psychological Disorders in Humanitarian Aid and Disaster Responders: A Critical Review
BACKGROUND: Although more people than ever are seeking primary care, the ratio of primary care providers to the population continues to rapidly decline. As such, registered nurses (RNs) are taking on increasingly central roles in primary care delivery. Yet little is known about their characteristics, their work environments, and the extent to which they experience poor job outcomes such as nurse burnout. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the characteristics of the primary care RN workforce and analyze the association of the nurse work environment with job outcomes in primary care. METHODS: Cross-sectional analysis of survey data representing N = 463 RNs who worked in 398 primary care practices, including primary care offices, community clinics, retail/urgent care clinics, and nurse-managed clinics. Survey questions included measures of the nurse work environment and levels of burnout, job dissatisfaction, and intent to leave. DISCUSSION: Approximately one-third of primary care RNs were burnt out and dissatisfied with their jobs, with the highest risk of these outcomes among RNs in community clinics. Community clinic RNs were also significantly more likely to be Black or Hispanic/Latino, hold a Bachelor of Science in Nursing, and speak English as a second language (all p < .01). Across all settings, better nurse work environments were significantly associated with lower levels of burnout and job dissatisfaction (both p < .01). CONCLUSION: Primary care practices must be equipped to support their RN workforce. Adequate nursing resources are especially needed in community clinics, as patients receiving primary care in these settings frequently face structural inequities.
Characteristics, Work Environments, and Rates of Burnout and Job Dissatisfaction Among Registered Nurses in Primary Care
A multisite research team proposed a survey to assess burnout among healthcare epidemiologists. Anonymous surveys were disseminated to eligible staff at SRN facilities. Half of the respondents were experiencing burnout. Staffing shortages were a key stressor. Allowing healthcare epidemiologists to provide guidance without directly enforcing policies may improve burnout.
Characterizing Burnout among Healthcare Epidemiologists in the Early Phases of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Study of the SHEA Research Network
IMPORTANCE: Moral injury and distress (MID), which occurs when individuals have significant dissonance with their belief system and overwhelming feelings of being powerless to do what is believed to be right, has not been explored in the unique population of military surgeons deployed far forward in active combat settings. Deployed military surgeons provide care to both injured soldiers and civilians under command-driven medical rules of engagement (MROE) in variably resourced settings. This practice setting has no civilian corollary for comparison or current specific tool for measurement. OBJECTIVE: To characterize MID among military surgeons deployed during periods of high casualty volumes through a mixed-methods approach. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This qualitative study using convergent mixed methods was performed from May 2020 to October 2020. Participants included US military surgeons who had combat deployments to a far-forward role 2 treatment facility during predefined peak casualty periods in Iraq (2003-2008) and Afghanistan (2009-2012), as identified by purposeful snowball sampling. Data analysis was performed from October 2020 to May 2021. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Measure of Moral Distress for Healthcare Professionals (MMD-HP) survey and individual, semistructured interviews were conducted to thematic saturation. RESULTS: The total cohort included 20 surgeons (mean [SD] age, 38.1 [5.2] years); 16 (80%) were male, and 16 (80%) had 0 or 1 prior deployment. Deployment locations were Afghanistan (11 surgeons [55%]), Iraq (9 surgeons [45%]), or both locations (3 surgeons [15%]). The mean (SD) MMD-HP score for the surgeons was 104.1 (39.3). The primary thematic domains for MID were distressing outcomes (DO) and MROE. The major subdomains of DO were guilt related to witnessing horrific injuries; treating pregnant women, children, and US soldiers; and second-guessing decisions. The major subdomains for MROE were forced transfer of civilian patients, limited capabilities and resources, inexperience in specialty surgical procedures, and communication with command. Postdeployment manifestations of MID were common and affected sleep, medical practice, and interpersonal relationships. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: In this qualitative study, MID was ubiquitous in deployed military surgeons. Thematic observations about MID, specifically concerning the domains of DO and MROE, may represent targets for further study to develop an evaluation tool of MID in this population and inform possible programs for identification and mitigation of MID.
Characterizing Moral Injury and Distress in US Military Surgeons Deployed to Far-Forward Combat Environments in Afghanistan and Iraq
Social workers are struggling within their professional and personal lives. Many clinical social workers who work in the mental health and medical field are struggling with poor health behaviors, secondary traumatic stress (STS), depression, anxiety, and burnout due to staff shortages, rapid turnover, compassion fatigue, and poor staff recruitment (Toh et al., 2018). Untreated trauma related to bereavement issues can result in PTSD and complicated grief symptoms in clinical populations when left untreated by a trained mental health clinician (Glad et al., 2022). Social work clinicians can expect therapeutic encounters to include discussions of deaths, loss, and reduced security contributing to negative mental health occurrences as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic. Social workers who work with families and individuals who are experiencing trauma are often adversely affected by these interactions, resulting in negative outcomes for the social worker (Caringi et al., 2017). A recent study of the COVID-19 pandemic and related mental health issues found an increase in anxiety and mental health issues related to stress, grief, fear, and depression (Estes & Thompson, 2020). Many social work clinicians may require mental health treatment of their own COVID-19 experiences, while simultaneously developing vicarious trauma (VT) and countertransference issues as a result of working with a clinical population in the treatment setting.
Clinical Crisis: When Your Therapist Needs Therapy!
[This is an excerpt.] Burnout rates among physicians continue to rise. In the 2023 Medscape Physician Burnout and Depression Report, 57% of family medicine physicians reported feeling burnt out — up 10 percentage points in five years. Among all specialties, 53% of physicians reported burnout. The top contributor was “too many bureaucratic tasks,” such as paperwork and charting requirements. Too many working hours and the increasing computerization of practice were also cited as key causes. A prior study helped quantify this burden. It showed that family physicians spent an average of 5.9 hours of an 11.4-hour workday in the electronic health record (EHR), with an average of nearly 90 minutes of “pajama time” (work outside of normal working hours) per day. [To read more, click View Resource.]
Clinical Workflow Efficiencies to Alleviate Physician Burnout and Reduce Work After Clinic
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate feasibility and effectiveness of Clinically Designed Improvisatory Music (CDIM) to reduce work-related stress for Neurology, Psychiatry, and other health professionals. BACKGROUND: Chronic stress characterizes healthcare providers’ lives. Music interventions show reductions in stress in the work setting. Our previous research showed that CDIM reduced cardiovascular burden and feelings of stress and anxiety in neurology patients. In this study, we investigated whether CDIM could also be used for Neurology and Psychiatry health care providers to decrease levels of stress. DESIGN/METHODS: CDIM is a form of clinical music designed along neuropsychiatric principles of felt safety. I was played by a certified music practitioner for 30 minutes. We used CDIM in three settings: 1. Neurology Department, 2. Psychiatric social workers, 3. Physician Recuperation Room located at Northwestern Memorial Hospital. All participants rated their experience on a scale of 1–10 reporting changes in emotions and states pertinent to burnout (likelihood to recommend [LTR], positive emotion, degree of tension, ability to experience pleasure, and energy levels). RESULTS: Four hundred twenty nine (429) healthcare providers took part in CDIM interventions. Participants recommended CDIM at a rate of 93% (+ 9%). They reported positive effects on emotion at 80% (+ 19%), decreased tension at 82% (+ 15%). Eighty percent (80%) found the intervention pleasurable and reported increased levels of energy following CDIM. Changes in energy levels went up from 60% (+ 16%) to to 80% (+ 16%). This latter change was significant at p= 0.0001. CONCLUSIONS: The CDIM interventions resulted in improvements in tension, energy, and of pleasure, which suggest an increase in capacity. These preliminary results indicate feasibility and effectiveness of CDIM as a viable intervention for supporting wellness and fighting burnout. We plan to provide and disseminate CDIM more widely to include more healthcare providers and staff, and to include physiologic measures by using wearable devices. DISCLOSURE: Ms. Takarabe has nothing to disclose. Rajan Shah has nothing to disclose. Mrs. Walesa has nothing to disclose. Miss Ngo has nothing to disclose. Dr. Wall has nothing to disclose. Mr. Pause has nothing to disclose. Gaurava Agarwal has nothing to disclose. Dr. Bonakdarpour has nothing to disclose.
Clinically Designed Improvisatory Music Interventions for Well-Being and Burnout Prevention for Neurology, Psychiatry, and Other Health Professionals: Preliminary Findings (S11.003)
BACKGROUND: Clinician burnout is a longstanding national problem threatening clinician health, patient outcomes, and the health care system. The aim of this study is to determine the proportion of hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) that are measuring and taking system actions to promote clinician well-being. METHODS: This cross-sectional study used an electronic questionnaire from April 21 to June 27, 2022, to assess the current state of organizational efforts to assess and address clinician well-being among a national sample of 1,982 Joint Commission-accredited hospitals and 256 accredited FQHCs. Outcomes of interest included the proportion of hospitals and FQHCs that assessed the prevalence of clinician burnout, established a chief wellness officer position, established a wellness committee, made clinician well-being an organizational performance metric, and implemented other activities/interventions that target clinician burnout. RESULTS: A total of 481 (21.5%) organizations responded to the survey (hospital n = 396 [20.0%], FQHC n = 85 [33.2%]). Response rates did not differ by organization size, type, teaching status or urban vs. rural location. Approximately one third (34.0%) of the organizations in the sample conducted an organizational well-being assessment among clinicians at least once in the past three years. Although nearly half of responding organizations reported implementing some kind of intervention to address clinician burnout, only 28.7% of organizations had adopted a comprehensive approach to address clinician well-being/burnout. Only 10.1% of hospitals and 5.4% of FQHCs reported having an established senior leadership position responsible for assessing and promoting clinician well-being at the organization level, and less than half (29.3% FQHCs, 37.6% hospitals) of organizations reported having an established wellness committee. Among 500+ bed hospitals, 61.2% had surveyed, 75.6% had established a well-being committee, 78.0% had implemented interventions to promote clinician well-being, and 26.8% had established a chief wellness officer. CONCLUSION: Although half of Joint Commission-accredited hospitals and FQHCs reported taking steps to improve clinician well-being, a minority are measuring clinician well-being, and few are taking a comprehensive approach or established a chief wellness officer position to advance clinician well-being as an organizational priority. Organizational clinician well-being improvement efforts are unlikely to be successful without measurement and leadership in place to drive change.
Clinician Well-Being Assessment and Interventions in Joint Commission-Accredited Hospitals and Federally Qualified Health Centers.
Key points
• Self-perceived wellness is known to worsen during medical education and training.
• Mitigation strategies should have a bifocal approach addressing individual as well as system-level factors.
• Organizations can better support well-being for their workforce by having leadership structure in place to drive well-being strategy and program development.
• Wellness programs need to have a multipronged strategy and should be focused on four key areas: healthy work environments, efficient processes, healthy people, and safe teams.