Resource Library

BACKGROUND: Burnout is a growing problem among medical professionals, reaching a crisis proportion. It is defined by emotional exhaustion, cynicism, and career dissatisfaction and is triggered by a mismatch between the values of the person and the demands of the workplace. Burnout has not previously been examined thoroughly in the Neurocritical Care Society (NCS). The purpose of this study is to assess the prevalence, contributing factors, and potential interventions to reduce burnout within the NCS. METHODS: A cross-sectional study of burnout was conducted using a survey distributed to members of the NCS. The electronic survey included personal and professional characteristic questions and the Maslach Burnout Inventory Human Services Survey for Medical Personnel (MBI). This validated measure assesses for emotional exhaustion (EE), depersonalization (DP), and personal achievement (PA). These subscales are scored as high, moderate, or low. Burnout (MBI) was defined as a high score in either EE or DP or a low score in PA. A Likert scale (0–6) was added to the MBI (which contained 22 questions) to provide summary data for the frequencies of each particular feeling. Categorical variables were compared using χ2 tests, and continuous variables were compared using t-tests. RESULTS: A total of 82% (204 of 248) of participants completed the entire questionnaire; 61% (124 of 204) were burned out by MBI criteria. A high score in EE was present in 46% (94 of 204), a high score in DP was present in 42% (85 of 204), and a low score in PA was present in 29% (60 of 204). The variables feeling burned out now, feeling burned out in the past, not having an effective/responsive supervisor, thinking about leaving one’s job due to burnout, and leaving one’s job due to burnout were significantly associated with burnout (MBI) (p < 0.05). Burnout (MBI) was also higher among respondents early in practice (currently training/post training 0–5 years) than among respondents post training 21 or more years. In addition, insufficient support staff contributed to burnout, whereas improved workplace autonomy was the most protective factor. CONCLUSIONS: Our study is the first to characterize burnout among a cross-section of physicians, pharmacists, nurses, and other practitioners in the NCS. A call to action and a genuine commitment by the hospital, organizational, local, and federal governmental leaders and society as a whole is essential to advocate for interventions to ameliorate burnout and care for our health care professionals.

INTRODUCTION: The personality traits of those who become orthopaedic surgeons may also lead to overwork, work-life balance issues, and burnout. Health and wellness practices of orthopaedic surgeons have not been widely explored. This study evaluated the personal health habits, wellness, and burnout of practicing orthopaedic surgeons in the United States. METHODS: An anonymous self-assessment survey was completed by 234 practicing orthopaedic surgeon alumni from two large residency programs. The survey assessed exercise habits according to Centers for Disease Control and Prevention recommendations, compliance with preventive medical care practices according to the United States Preventive Services Task Force, prioritization of occupational wellness strategies, and the presence of burnout via an adapted Maslach Burnout Inventory. Survey responders' mean age was 52 years, 88% were male, and 93% had a body mass index <30 kg/m2. Surgeons were stratified according to practice type, years in practice, and subspecialty. RESULTS: Among orthopaedic surgeons, compliance with aerobic and strength exercise recommendations was 31%. Surgeons in academic practice were significantly (P = 0.007) less compliant with exercise recommendations (18%) compared with private (34%) or employed (43%) practicing surgeons. Most (71%) had seen their primary care provider within 2 years and were up to date on age-appropriate health care screening including a cholesterol check within 5 years (79%), colonoscopy (89%), and mammogram (92%). Protecting time away from work for family/friends and finding meaning in work were the most important wellness strategies. The overall burnout rate was 15% and remained not significantly different (P > 0.3) regardless of years in practice, practice type, or subspecialty. CONCLUSION: This survey study identifies practicing orthopaedic surgeons' health habits and wellness strategies, including limited compliance with aerobic and strength exercise recommendations. Orthopaedic surgeons should be aware of areas of diminished personal wellness to improve quality of life and avoid burnout.

OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to explore overall prevalence of burnout among physicians during early and late COVID-19 pandemic and geographical differences in burnout. METHODS: This review was registered prospectively with PROSPERO (CRD42022327959). A comprehensive search of several databases, including Ovid MEDLINE(R) and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations and Daily, Ovid Embase, Ovid Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Ovid Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, PsycINFO, and Scopus, spanning from December 2019 to May 2022 was conducted. Eligible studies included physicians or medical professionals including physicians that worked directly or indirectly with COVID-19 patients, whilst reporting burnout outcomes using a validated scale. Literature that did not include physicians or did not occur in a hospital setting were excluded. Literature including medical students were also excluded. RESULTS: Forty-five observational studies were included, all of which were cross-sectional studies. The pooled estimate of overall prevalence of burnout was 54.60% (95% CI: 46.7, 62.2). Mean emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal accomplishment was found to be 22.06% (95% CI: 18.19, 25.94), 8.72 (95% CI: 6.48, 10.95) and 31.18 (95% CI: 27.33, 35.03) respectively. Frontline workers displayed higher rates of burnout than second-line healthcare workers (HCW) (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13, 2.37). Studies from the early pandemic period reported burnout prevalence of 60.7% (95% CI: 48.2, 72) compared to a prevalence of 49.3% (95% CI: 37.7, 60.9) from the late pandemic period. Geographically, burnout was highest amongst Middle East and North Africa (MENA) studies (66.6%, 95% CI: 54.7, 78.5), followed by Europe (48.8%, 95% CI: 40.3, 57.3) and then South America (42%, 95% CI: –0.4, 84.4). Lastly, burnout prevalence overall (OR = 0.77, 95% CI: 0.36, 1.67) emotional exhaustion (MD = –0.36, 95% CI: –4.64, 3.91), depersonalization (MD = –0.31, 95% CI: –1.80, 1.18), and personal accomplishment (MD = 0.55, 95% CI: –0.73, 1.83) were found comparable between physicians and nurses. CONCLUSION: COVID-19 has had significant consequences on HCW burnout. Further research is needed to examine early signs of burnout and to develop effective coping strategies.

BACKGROUND: Weighing implications of multiple intensive cancer-directed therapies over time, oncology nurses are more prone to intrinsic distress compared to nurses in non-oncologic settings. This vulnerability may give rise to moral distress. Yet, little is known about moral distress experiences of oncology nurses. OBJECTIVE: This systematic review and meta-analysis examined the frequency and intensity of moral distress among oncology nurses with an exploratory focus on nurse-level and work-related characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a systematic search of 7 electronic databases (2000–2020) supplemented by hand-search strategy. Means and standard deviations of moral distress scores in the included studies were extracted and pooled in our meta-analysis. RESULTS: Our sample of 8 cross-sectional studies consisting of 2686 participants with 1654 oncology nurses met criteria for inclusion. A random-effects model was used in our meta-analysis given considerable heterogeneity. Our results suggest that moral distress was of low to moderate frequency, but of high intensity. Moral distress among oncology nurses was a significant predictor for burnout, provider communication, decisions surrounding end-of-life care, work conditions (eg, patient assignment, type of unit), and inability to provide compassionate care. CONCLUSION: Moral distress in oncology nurses is associated with burnout syndrome, compassion fatigue, and secondary traumatic stress syndrome, all of which are linked to poor patient care and outcomes. Robust psychological well-being is critical in minimizing unintended consequences of moral distress. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Oncology nurses are at high risk for moral distress due to the nature of their work. Future studies should examine the prevalence among oncology nurses to help inform targeted interventions.

Ambulance services are changing, and the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic has been a major challenge in the past three years. Job satisfaction and work engagement are important characteristics for a healthy organization and success in one’s profession. The purpose of the current systematic review was to evaluate the predictors of job satisfaction and work engagement in prehospital emergency medical service personnel. Electronic databases, such as PubMed, Ovid Medline, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, PsycINFO, PSYNDEX, and Embase, were utilized in this review. Predictors (ß coefficient, odds ratio, rho) of higher job satisfaction and work engagement were examined. Only prehospital emergency medical service personnel were considered. The review included 10 studies worldwide with 8358 prehospital emergency medical service personnel (24.9% female). The main predictor for job satisfaction was supervisors’ support. Other predictors were younger or middle age and work experience. Emotional exhaustion and depersonalization, as burnout dimensions, were negative predictors for higher job satisfaction or work engagement. Quality demands for health care systems are a significant challenge for future emergency medical services. The psychological and physical strengthening of employees is necessary and includes constant supervision of managers or facilitators.

This systematic review investigates the association between coping strategies and burnout in emergency workers. Three electronic databases were searched. Eleven eligible articles were extracted, and quality assessed. Findings were integrated through narrative synthesis, highlighting clear methodological issues around conceptualizing, and measuring coping strategies and burnout with agreed upon tools. This review found no convincing evidence to suggest coping strategies have a meaningful relationship with burnout in emergency workers, questioning the evidence base for psychological interventions focusing on modifying coping strategies to target burnout. To understand the true impact of coping strategies on burnout, more longitudinal designs, and an agreed, validated measure for coping is needed.

From a philosophical standpoint, it is unclear precisely what medical gaslighting is, how it presents, its conditions for success, and how it is differentiated from the more popular interpersonal interpretation of gaslighting. My project aims to remedy this lacuna by developing an account of medical gaslighting as distinguished from that in strictly interpersonal relationships. My approach consists of first exploring the importance of developing a philosophical account of medical gaslighting and providing five criteria that a sufficient account must meet. I then analyze and appraise two accounts of ordinary gaslighting by Kate Abramson and Carla Bagnoli and argue that neither account accurately explains the features and characteristics of medical gaslighting. Further, I describe the key characteristics and identifiable features that make up my account of medical gaslighting. I also address the moral implications of medical gaslighting and argue that it involves two distinct moral harms: the primary moral harm undermines a patient's agency, and the secondary moral harm causes moral injury to doctors. Finally, I call for institutional reform by discussing the policy implications resulting from developing an accounting of medical gaslighting. By developing and identifying the specific nature of medical gaslighting, we will be better equipped to understand patients' experiences and aim toward better quality care.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Clinician workload is a key contributor to burnout and well-being as well as overtime and staff shortages, particularly in the primary care setting. Appointment volume is primarily driven by the size of patient panels assigned to clinicians. Thus, finding the most appropriate panel size for each clinician is essential to optimization of patient care. METHODS: One year of appointment and panel data from the Department of Family Medicine were used to model the optimal panel size. The data consisted of 82 881 patients and 105 clinicians. This optimization-based modeling approach determines the panel size that maximizes clinician capacity while distributing heterogeneous appointment types among clinician groups with respect to their panel management time (PMT), which is the percent of clinic work. RESULTS: The differences between consecutive PMT physician groups in total annual appointment volumes per clinician for the current practice range from 176 to 348. The optimization-based approach for the same PMT physician group results in having a range from 211 to 232 appointments, a relative reduction in variability of 88%. Similar workload balance gains are also observed for advanced practice clinicians and resident groups. These results show that the proposed approach significantly improves both patient and appointment workloads distributed among clinician groups. CONCLUSION: Appropriate panel size has valuable implications for clinician well-being, patients' timely access to care, clinic and health system productivity, and the quality of care delivered. Results demonstrate substantial improvements with respect to balancing appointment workload across clinician types through strategic use of an optimization-based approach.

Limited research has examined what factors serve as potential barriers and motivators for law enforcement personnel in seeking mental health support. The current study presents findings from a survey of 158 sworn and civilian personnel from a large Southeastern Sheriff's office to shed light on these potential barriers/motivators. We drew on previous literature to create measures related to mental health stigma, confidentiality, burnout, various stressors, and organizational support, among others. The main effects OLS regression models suggest that increased perceptions of stigma and personal stressors significantly lowered employees' willingness to seek mental health support. However, increased burnout and job satisfaction were associated with employees seeking mental health support. Multiplicative models show that as job satisfaction increased within nonwhite respondents, those respondents were significantly more likely to seek mental health assistance. However, as personal stressors increased among nonwhite respondents, those respondents were significantly less likely to seek help. Finally, as overall health increased among white respondents, those respondents were significantly more likely to seek help. Findings indicate that mental health issues experienced by employees vary based on group membership. We discuss several future research directions and policy implications derived from these findings.

[This is an excerpt.] When the coronavirus pandemic hit North America in March of 2020 the medical profession was plunged into a crisis more devastating than any it had faced in the previous century. Trainees and physicians were called to the frontlines to care for extremely ill patients for long hours in the context of inadequate knowledge, skills, and equipment; patients were dying without loved ones to hold their hands and ease their passage. Ethical dilemmas around distribution of limited resources permeated each medical decision and led to moral injury for providers who could not deliver the quality of care that was standard just weeks prior. Healthcare professional burnout and suicide increased from the already significant pre-pandemic rates.1 Many medical schools limited students to virtual learning to protect them from exposure to the virus; yet a byproduct of this prudent decision was that many students found themselves isolated from peers and teachers, and in living situations suboptimal for class attendance and studying. Some questioned whether they were getting an education that would allow them to become good doctors. [To read more, click View Resource.]

Defining burnout and why it has increased among health care providers

When the World Health Organization announced a global pandemic in March of 2020, health care workers across the globe selflessly and tirelessly stood at the frontline. In addition to the clinical challenges an unknown virus brought forth, health care workers were not prepared for the emotional drain and mental health impact. The health care industry is increasingly facing a crisis as frontline workers experience moral distress, emotional trauma, and burnout in high stress health care environments. Debriefing, defined as facilitated interprofessional team reflection after a clinical event, has been shown to improve clinicians’ ability to manage their grief and is associated with lower burnout. A standardized program workshop and intervention, branded as Project Debriefing Event for Analysis and Recovery (D.E.A.R.), was piloted at a pediatric hospital with a multidisciplinary team. These volunteers served as champions to facilitate debriefings following stressful clinical events. The program included education sessions, integration of a standardized debriefing program, and additional resources. Impact of the workshop and educational intervention was evaluated using a pre–post survey design. Data demonstrated increased comfort for the interprofessional facilitators who provided the standardized debriefing. Participants found the sessions highlighted strengths and areas for opportunity. Champions and participants agreed the standardized process improved their emotional wellbeing. Future quality improvement projects are encouraged to standardize debriefing processes addressing the increased need for support to clinicians after a critical incident has occurred.

Burnout of physicians and other medical personnel is a major problem in the economics of healthcare systems, potentially costing billions of dollars. Knowledge of the determinants and costs of burnout at the organization level is sparse, making it difficult to assess the net benefits of interventions to reduce burnout at the level where arguably the greatest change can be affected. In this paper, we use data from a midsize healthcare organization with about 500 clinicians in 2021-22 to advance analysis of clinical burnout in two ways. First, we estimate the costs of clinician burnout beyond the widely studied losses due to turnover. Including hard-to-measure and potentially long-term costs that arise from reduced patient satisfaction and lower productivity of burnt-out clinicians at work, our analysis suggests a much higher cost of burnout per clinician than previous estimates that exclude these costs. Second, we use standard medical billing and administrative operating data to forecast turnover and productivity of clinicians to serve as an early warning system. Accurate estimates of both the cost of burnout now and of likely future costs should help decision-makers be proactive in their approach to solving the burnout crisis currently affecting the healthcare industry. While our empirical analysis relates to a particular healthcare organization, the framework for quantifying the costs of burnout can be used by other organizations to assess the cost-effectiveness of ameliorative policies.

BACKGROUND: The concept of a ‘black cloud’ is a common unfounded perception in the healthcare workforce that attributes a heavier workload to specific individuals or teams. Prior studies in non-surgical disciplines have demonstrated that ‘black cloud’ perceptions are not associated with workload, albeit such perceptions may influence behavior. The influence of ‘black cloud’ perceptions on surgical resident workload and burnout remains to be investigated. This study assesses the associations between ‘black cloud’ self-perception with actual workload and burnout among surgical residents in different specialties. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey study of postgraduate year (PGY) 2 and 3 residents enrolled in different surgical residencies at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai was conducted between September–November 2021. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 62.1% (41/66). 46.3% of respondents were female. The majority of subjects were single (61%) and PGY2 trainees (56.1%). In a multivariate regression analysis demographic factors and workload variables, such as the number of pages responded, notes, and amount of sleep, were not significant predictors of a ‘black cloud’-self-perception. A significantly lower Burnout Index Score (BIS) was observed among females (p< .001). A significantly higher BIS was observed among residents who are single (p = .003), training in general surgery (p = .02), and orthopedic surgery (p = .03). There was no significant association between ‘black cloud’ self-perception and BIS. DISCUSSION: The findings demonstrate that a ‘black cloud’ self-perception is not associated with a high workload and burnout among surgical residents. Gender, marriage/domestic partnership, and certain surgical specialties influenced burnout among the study cohort.

BACKGROUND: Emergency Medicine has a high rate of physician burnout. Studies have shown that exercise and social activities have positive impacts on physician wellness. Many residency programs have implemented initiatives aimed to positively impact the emotional, physical, intellectual, and social aspects of wellness. OBJECTIVES: The purpose was to improve EM physician wellness by implementing a voluntary team exercise competition into an EM residency program wellness curriculum over 3 months. METHODS: This study utilized a voluntary survey to compare wellness pre- and post-competition. The population studied included 33 EM residents and 28 EM attending participants. Residents were grouped based on pre-established residency “Houses” and attendings assigned to one of these Houses at random. Participants earned 1 point for every 30 minutes of exercise with the winning team earning a residency funded “House Party” at the end of the 3-month period. Data from the survey was analyzed using a 2 Sample T-Test to assess for significance. The mean values of the pre/post data were compared to determine if an aim of 25% improvement in wellness was met. RESULTS: Resident survey results showed that 100% exercised more during this competition and 100% would participate again. There was improvement in wellbeing (p = 0.026), energy (p = 0.014), and sleep (p = 0.025); these areas all also met the aim of improving by more than 25% after this 3-month competition (25%, 36%, 33% respectively). 80% of residents felt that their increased exercise positively impacted their wellness at work. CONCLUSIONS: EM residents had improvement in wellness, energy, and sleep after implementing a team exercise competition. A majority of participants felt this competition encouraged an increase in their exercise and stated they would participate again. Limitations include confounding variables impacting wellness such as changing weather or rotations, low survey response rate, and survey type.

BACKGROUND: Hospitals and healthcare systems strive to meet benchmarks for the National Database of Nursing Quality Indicator (NDNQI) measures, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) Core Measures, and Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) outcome indicators. Prior research indicates that Chief Nursing Officers and Executives (CNOs, CNEs) believe that evidence-based practice (EBP) is important for ensuring the quality of care, but they allocate little funding to its implementation and report it as a low priority in their healthcare system. It is not known how EBP budget investment by chief nurses affects NDNQI, CMS Core Measures, and HCAHPS indicators or key EBP attributes and nurse outcomes. AIMS: This study aimed to generate evidence on the relationships among the budget devoted to EBP by chief nurses and its impact on key patient and nurse outcomes along with EBP attributes. METHODS: A descriptive correlational design was used. An online survey was sent to CNO and CNE members (N = 5026) of various national and regional nurse leader professional organizations across the United States in two recruitment rounds. Data collected included CNO/CNE EBP Beliefs, EBP Implementation, and perceived organizational culture of EBP; organizational culture, structure, personnel, and resources for EBP; percent of budget dedicated to EBP; key performance measures (NDNQI, CMS Core Measures, HCAHPS); nurse satisfaction; nurse turnover; and demographic questions. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize sample characteristics. Kendall's Tau correlation coefficients were calculated among EBP budget, nursing outcome measures, and EBP measures. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen CNEs/CNOs completed the survey (a 2.3% response rate). The majority (60.9%) allocated <5% of their budget to EBP, with a third investing none. An increase in EBP budget was associated with fewer patient falls and trauma, less nursing turnover, and stronger EBP culture and other positive EBP attributes. A greater number of EBP projects were also associated with better patient outcomes. LINKING EVIDENCE TO ACTION: Chief nurse executives and CNOs allocate very little of their budgets to EBP. When CNEs and CNOs invest more in EBP, patient, nursing, and EBP outcomes improve. System-wide implementation of EBP, which includes appropriate EBP budget allocation, is necessary for improvements in hospital quality indicators and nursing turnover.

INTRODUCTION: Surgeons and perioperative staff experience high rates of burnout manifesting as exhaustion, depersonalization, and lack of achievement. Consequences include increases in errors and adverse patient events. Little data exist regarding the effectiveness of multidisciplinary peer support systems in combatting burnout. We sought to improve staff morale through establishment of a formally trained, multidisciplinary peer support team. METHODS: Selfselected surgeons, anesthesiologists, and nurses were formally trained as Peer Responders as part of an institutional peer support program. All perioperative staff at our pediatric surgery center (n = 120) were surveyed before initiation of the program and then 1-mo and 12-mo after initiation. Primary outcomes were unit morale, unit support, and peer approachability. Kruskal-Wallis tests and Chi-squared tests were used for comparison of primary outcomes among surveys and by position with an alpha value of 0.05 set for significance. Institutional review board approval was waived. RESULTS: The survey response rates were 57.5%, 32.5%, and 37.5% chronologically. After 1 year, there were statistically significant increases in unit support (P < 0.01) and peer approachability (P < 0.001), and a nonstatistically significant increase in unit morale (P = 0.22). On subgroup analysis by staff role, surgeons were least likely to utilize peer support. CONCLUSIONS: A multidisciplinary peer support team is an effective and easily reproducible means of building a culture of support and improving morale among perioperative staff. surgeons were least likely to seek interprofessional peer support. Consequently, surgeon-specific strategies may be necessary. Further investigations are ongoing regarding secondary effects on staff burnout rates, patient safety, and quality of care.

Fifty-six percent of nurses in a national sample reported burnout symptoms in 2022. Although the nursing literature on burnout dates back to 1978, nurses and other health professionals continue to grapple with this workplace phenomenon that leads to deleterious outcomes, including suicide. The suicide risk among US nurses now surpasses that of physicians. Stories of nurses who have died by suicide or considered it are emerging, and some are similar to this suicide note titled, “A Letter to My Abuser,” which was published as a letter to the editor from the nurse’s parents. More attention is needed to meaningfully address nursing burnout and this can be done by also using an equity lens.

Burnout is a phenomenon characterized by high emotional exhaustion—feelings of energy depletion, high depersonalization (i.e., cynicism) and detachment from the job, and loss of professional efficacy—sense of ineffectiveness and lack of accomplishment. In fact, it has received a certain kind of official imprimatur by having its own ICD-10 code and now it is considered a “syndrome,” although it is not classified as a medical condition. In the ICD-11 classification, burnout appears in the section on problems related to employment or unemployment. Burn-out is included in the 11th Revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11) as an occupational phenomenon. It is not classified as a medical condition. It has to be related to the occupational context, but it’s not just fatigue or even emotional drain that follows a busy night on call, especially when you know all you need is a good night’s sleep. It is also not depression.